Lancer Nation

Honesty Always Welcomed!
 
Lancer NationLancer Nation  HomeHome  FAQFAQ  RegisterRegister  Log inLog in  

Share | 
 

 Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in

View previous topic View next topic Go down 
Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
AuthorMessage
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Wed Apr 21, 2010 2:18 pm

haha.. oh ya.
for 500m distance drag i think it wil b no issue.
Back to top Go down
dye
Member


Number of posts : 4
Vehicle Type : What type of Lancer Vehicle do you own?
Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Wed Apr 21, 2010 3:36 pm

bro bahaya drag pakai tayar sotong ..hehehee
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:09 am

true bro.. tayar sotong really like sotong.. no grip on road.. wil run like sotong ziq zag soft style.
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Tue Jul 13, 2010 10:23 pm

so da result???? open pod or drop in??? ngeeeeeeee
Back to top Go down
Reverend
Admin
avatar

Number of posts : 355
Vehicle Type : Lansi
Registration date : 2009-09-08

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:17 am

Fuza wrote:
so da result???? open pod or drop in??? ngeeeeeeee
Open pod only when sustained high rev. Otherwise practically no difference.
Back to top Go down
Elan
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 534
Vehicle Type : Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-02

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Wed Jul 14, 2010 12:06 pm

drop in has better pick up (0-100kmh).. open pod wrks better at high rpm..
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Wed Jul 14, 2010 2:39 pm

Owh... Ok..
Back to top Go down
nofear1979
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 199
Vehicle Type : Lancer GT, 2009 Model
Registration date : 2010-03-18

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:30 pm

i still prefer drop in....

open pod need to do CAI...
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:43 pm

KNN dropin fan
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Wed Jul 14, 2010 6:46 pm

I think our front bumper ady had gud design for better vetilation. So if using open pod, still dun hv tu put cai thingy infront... Evo x hood help much oso... Unless using injen cai.. I saw one video comparing open pod, drop in & injen. Open pod had the best result... Correct me if im wrong.
Back to top Go down
nofear1979
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 199
Vehicle Type : Lancer GT, 2009 Model
Registration date : 2010-03-18

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Wed Jul 14, 2010 7:14 pm

Fuza wrote:
I think our front bumper ady had gud design for better vetilation. So if using open pod, still dun hv tu put cai thingy infront... Evo x hood help much oso... Unless using injen cai.. I saw one video comparing open pod, drop in & injen. Open pod had the best result... Correct me if im wrong.


Yeap.. u are right... with the evoX hood...

but with lancer ori hood, still need cai~~~ i feel the engine area there damn hot.... ...
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Wed Jul 14, 2010 9:13 pm

original evo X hood got ventilation system design.
got special flap under hood below the 2 front scoop. the flap was diif in shape left & right for the purpose of inlet/outlet air to engine room.
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Thu Jul 15, 2010 12:24 am

gelygeleman wrote:
original evo X hood got ventilation system design.
got special flap under hood below the 2 front scoop. the flap was diif in shape left & right for the purpose of inlet/outlet air to engine room.
owh really eh... Mmg cun...
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Thu Jul 15, 2010 11:26 pm

cf hood main material about 98% was made by Fibreglass Reinforce Plastic (FRP). During fabrication, they wil put 1 layer of carbon fibre look film on top of it.

front upper scoop was copy same as ori X design. but cf hood not having lower flap. tis lower flap was design to create air flow circulation in engine bay. i think it can be done by custom made.
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Fri Jul 16, 2010 12:43 am

Custom made using fibre..??
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Fri Jul 16, 2010 9:08 pm

ask lambo penang. mayb he got both upper scoop & lower flap. ori X lower flap made by aluminium.
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Sat Jul 17, 2010 12:30 am

bro gg... since u're using alluminium evo x hood.. can u post some picture of lower flap..
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Sun Jul 18, 2010 12:12 am

wil do later
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Sun Jul 18, 2010 3:46 pm

front lower flapscoop (left & right)
(Left)
(Right)
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Sun Jul 18, 2010 7:28 pm

Tq bro... Are this same wit wat people call as undertray???
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Mon Jul 19, 2010 12:50 am

no
Back to top Go down
Elan
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 534
Vehicle Type : Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-02

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Tue Jul 20, 2010 2:00 am

undertray is the silver color below the hood.
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Tue Jul 20, 2010 1:59 pm

Oic.. Now i know
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Tue Jul 20, 2010 5:46 pm

undertray & underflap was diff thing & diff function
Back to top Go down
are-peach
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 60
Vehicle Type : lancer GT-white
Registration date : 2010-06-04

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Thu Jul 22, 2010 3:30 pm

any advice for trust setup use open pod or drop in?
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Thu Jul 22, 2010 4:33 pm

If not mistaken bro gg using drop in..
Back to top Go down
Elan
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 534
Vehicle Type : Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-02

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Fri Jul 23, 2010 12:35 am

open pod makes yr trust sound more ganas...
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:13 am

Open pod itself hv best sound...
Back to top Go down
Elan
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 534
Vehicle Type : Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-02

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Fri Jul 23, 2010 5:01 am

i was with open pod + trust last time..
Back to top Go down
are-peach
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 60
Vehicle Type : lancer GT-white
Registration date : 2010-06-04

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Fri Jul 23, 2010 10:24 am

em.. have member use drop in + trust. any compare trust + open pod with trust + drop in
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Fri Jul 23, 2010 11:33 am

Elan wrote:
i was with open pod + trust last time..

stated there was... thats mean still modding.. heheh
Back to top Go down
Elan
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 534
Vehicle Type : Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-02

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Fri Jul 23, 2010 1:22 pm

hehehe..
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Mon Jul 26, 2010 1:26 am

bro elan.. tuner joe eh yg ask u to change to drop in.. can share why eh??
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Mon Jul 26, 2010 2:24 pm

are-peach wrote:
em.. have member use drop in + trust. any compare trust + open pod with trust + drop in

bro elan was rite. using trust with open pod wil create in-cabin sound more louder & ganas. good sound system.
last time when i tune my unichip in sg, the tuner joseph king recommended me to used hiflow dropin with stright flow setup (trust) to get the optimum response pick-up launch til midrange (midrange means 210km/h ).
Back to top Go down
are-peach
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 60
Vehicle Type : lancer GT-white
Registration date : 2010-06-04

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Mon Jul 26, 2010 4:31 pm

gelygeleman wrote:
are-peach wrote:
em.. have member use drop in + trust. any compare trust + open pod with trust + drop in

bro elan was rite. using trust with open pod wil create in-cabin sound more louder & ganas. good sound system.
last time when i tune my unichip in sg, the tuner joseph king recommended me to used hiflow dropin with stright flow setup (trust) to get the optimum response pick-up launch til midrange (midrange means 210km/h ).

can share detail? picture or link
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:21 pm

straight flow setup:
Hotbit header + ori tringle centre box + topcat midbox + trust muffler with mod silencer
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:36 am

bro gg... what is ur topcat midbox size?
Back to top Go down
Elan
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 534
Vehicle Type : Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-02

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:21 am

2 inch inlet and outlet..
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Tue Jul 27, 2010 2:17 am

nope.. i mean the box.. how long it is.
Back to top Go down
are-peach
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 60
Vehicle Type : lancer GT-white
Registration date : 2010-06-04

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Tue Jul 27, 2010 10:32 am

my setup. hotbit header ---- top cat--- standart moddle box---trust. any comment?
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Tue Jul 27, 2010 4:08 pm

early 2010 Im using topcat midbox oso. Ard 1f lenght. Top speed suck. Then advised by my previous tuner, changed to 1.5f. Baru ok. As i know topspeed exhaust using ard 1f topcat midbox.
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:13 pm

topspeed got 2 type of topcat centre box. 1ft and 1.3f length.
most of previoust trusts gang was use 1ft topcat. those who install on 2009 onward was using 1.3f. im on 1.3f topcat.
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Wed Jul 28, 2010 7:13 pm

are-peach wrote:
my setup. hotbit header ---- top cat--- standart moddle box---trust. any comment?

right setup..
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Wed Jul 28, 2010 9:01 pm

Owh... Ok2.. Mybe i got old stock.. Cit
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Thu Jul 29, 2010 12:33 am

mayb ayong daughter finished the long topcat at that time.
Back to top Go down
Fuza
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 556
Vehicle Type : LGT 2.0, white
Registration date : 2010-05-17

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:20 pm

Hoho... Midbox tu skang ade kt myvi...
Back to top Go down
are-peach
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 60
Vehicle Type : lancer GT-white
Registration date : 2010-06-04

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Thu Jul 29, 2010 10:36 pm

what about HKS drop in?
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:59 pm

hks drop in oso good.. no worries
Back to top Go down
are-peach
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 60
Vehicle Type : lancer GT-white
Registration date : 2010-06-04

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:16 am

ok. robert buat offer now rm150
Back to top Go down
gelygeleman
Member
avatar

Number of posts : 900
Vehicle Type : Mitsubishi Lancer GT
Registration date : 2010-03-03

PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   Fri Jul 30, 2010 12:26 am

wah.. i think good price. i bought hiflow KNN with price 330 last 2 years at robert.
Back to top Go down
Sponsored content




PostSubject: Re: Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in   

Back to top Go down
 
Open Pod vs High Flow Drop-in
View previous topic View next topic Back to top 
Page 2 of 3Go to page : Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
 Similar topics
-
» Bassani X Pipe with high flow cats and delete pipes
» High Flow Water Pump?
» 86-93 5.0 H-Pipe with High Flow Converters
» water pump stock or high flow??
» Low Budget High Flow Exhaust Insert

Permissions in this forum:You cannot reply to topics in this forum
Lancer Nation :: Lancer Nation Garage :: 9th Generation Lancer :: Engine/Drivetrain : Engine, Transmission and Performance-
Jump to: